![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Take meme here: http://slackhalla.org/~demise/test/socialattitude.php
Political Values
Radicalism 88.5
Socialism 43.75
Tenderness 50
These scores indicate that you are a progressive; this is the political profile one might associate with a university professor. It appears that you are skeptical towards religion, and have a pragmatic attitude towards humanity in general.
Your attitudes towards economics appear neither committedly capitalist nor socialist, and combined with your social attitudes this creates the picture of someone who would generally be described as a political centrist.
To round out the picture you appear to be, political preference aside, an egalitarian with few strong opinions.
This concludes our analysis; we hope you found your results accurate, useful, and interesting.
Unlike many other political tests found on the Internet which base themselves on untested (and usually ideologically motivated) ideas, this inventory is adapted from Hans Eysenck's own political inventory which was developed after extensive empirical investigations in the 20th Century.
Huh. Well, I think that's mostly fair enough. Pragmatic agnostic over here, so yeah. Though I'm not sure about egalitarianism. Depends on how we're defining it. But general equality of all people, yes, I can go with that. Though, really, I don't usually do politics at all. Heh.
Political Values
Radicalism 88.5
Socialism 43.75
Tenderness 50
These scores indicate that you are a progressive; this is the political profile one might associate with a university professor. It appears that you are skeptical towards religion, and have a pragmatic attitude towards humanity in general.
Your attitudes towards economics appear neither committedly capitalist nor socialist, and combined with your social attitudes this creates the picture of someone who would generally be described as a political centrist.
To round out the picture you appear to be, political preference aside, an egalitarian with few strong opinions.
This concludes our analysis; we hope you found your results accurate, useful, and interesting.
Unlike many other political tests found on the Internet which base themselves on untested (and usually ideologically motivated) ideas, this inventory is adapted from Hans Eysenck's own political inventory which was developed after extensive empirical investigations in the 20th Century.
Huh. Well, I think that's mostly fair enough. Pragmatic agnostic over here, so yeah. Though I'm not sure about egalitarianism. Depends on how we're defining it. But general equality of all people, yes, I can go with that. Though, really, I don't usually do politics at all. Heh.
